sagutin ng tanong na ito

noong unang panahon Tanong

Did anybody see that coming?

I think it's kinda cool actually but I never would have guessed that Rumpelstiltskin would be the beast.
*
I think it's a little bit disgusting, he seems so much older than belle, Idk I had imagined that he would be a real prince, just like in the real fairytale story... but maybe I'm gonna change my mind, who knows what happens :)
forwood_fan1987 posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas
 sam227 posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas
next question »

noong unang panahon Sagot

CelestialDream said:
The idea had crossed my mind but I didn't think it would actually happen. According to scoops they did say we had already met the Beast but I had thought it would be a character we hadn't learned the Fairytale character identity of yet.

I guess it kinda works though. But I was rather hoping it would be someone else or new. I didn't expect characters to wind up having 2 fairytale identities, like how Genie also wound up being the Magic Mirror.
select as best answer
posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas 
ratava123 said:
At first when I saw it I was like EWW soo not right! But then I realized that Rumpelstiltskin seems to be apart of all the major fairy tales like Sinderella and Snow White and so it only makes sense that he's apart of Beauty's.
select as best answer
posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas 
dreamfields said:
In one sense I wonder if the prebiyu is misleading us. Because the beast turns back to a prince.
But for some reason the writers allow Rumpelstiltskin to rewrite stories. Example would be when he zapped Cinderella's fairy godmother to get her wand.
We will have to wait and see.
select as best answer
posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas 
*
That's true.
JaseKS posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas
JaseKS said:
I KNOW RIGHT?!

This was my face -> :O

How is Mr. ginto the Beast and Rumpelstiltskin at the same time?

Oh wait! I've figured it out!

They couldn't find another actor.
select as best answer
posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas 
*
lol
dreamfields posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas
*
I think they're playing mind games with us.
dreamfields posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas
*
ikr? Oh, Rumpelstiltskin, him and his constant twisting of the plot line.
JaseKS posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas
woodelf said:
No, but I pag-ibig it! I wouldn't be surprised if one of the writers had read the very excellent "The Witch's Boy" sa pamamagitan ng Michael Gruber, which looks at a certain fairy tale character from a different angle... I highly recommend seeing if your local aklatan or bookstore has it (probably in the young adult section); it's a beautifully written book that I think most fans of OUAT would enjoy!
select as best answer
posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas 
robinsparkles97 said:
When I first saw that I was like ooooooh...bad call. But now I'm actually starting to pag-ibig the idea! I think it shall be, in a word, amaaaaazing and legendary!
select as best answer
posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas 
magicfairydust said:
I did NOT see that coming but the idea is so cool. and now that the episode has aired, I really loved it!
select as best answer
posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas 
_sacarlett_ said:
yea, but it threw me for a loop for sure
select as best answer
posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas 
BadWolf35 said:
Nope. I didn't find out untill I actually saw the episode, I never saw any of the promos. As soon as I saw that he was the beast I knew it would be a good episode, Rumplestiltskin has been my favourite character from the beginning. Robert Carlyle plays him brilliantly.
select as best answer
posted sa loob ng isang taon na ang nakalipas 
next question »