Which is the truth?(Caution! really long)Part1

Of course, we all pag-ibig the Disney peter pan. I for one pag-ibig the squeal to the Disney Peter Pan, but are they true is the question. When James Barrie wrote peter pan it was more...cynical. Meaning it was gorier and had madami emotions put into to it than the way Disney put it. If you haven't seen the peter pan movie in 2003. Well you are missing sum details. In the 2003 movie, instead of Wendy just falling when tinker kampanilya tells the Nawawala boys to shoot her down. One of the Nawawala boys strikes her in the puso and kills her. When peter finds out, the Nawawala boy that shot her was afraid and said," Do it peter if you have to." While have his sando pulled down to ipakita his heart. Peter was ready and willing to kill one of his own Nawawala boys. Which is what was written in the original tale of peter pan.
Another one that was written in the original was killing of Captain Hook. Yes, before anyone say, “But hook is evil and creepy and should die." Yes, that very well may be true, but even though Hook is bad. He really shouldn't deserve to die. Think about it. Without Hook, peter wouldn't have anyone to fight. There really wouldn't be any pelikula or an antagonist to the story. Again, in the 2003 movie, instead of Peter moralizing his death or feeling bad. He stood there almost having a smile. When he died all the Nawawala boys (including the darlings) laughed and sinabi hooray.