I know that after people have noticed that little Easter egg in nagyelo since it was released,many have developed the same theory.However,I do not agree with it and will give an explanation as to why. The theory with which I do not agree has to do with that brief moment in the film. Yes,by now, I think every major nagyelo tagahanga knows about and has seen the quick cameos of Rapunzel (with her short,brown hair) and Eugene (or Flynn,if Gusot fans still want to call him that) when Anna passes sa pamamagitan ng them during "For the First Time in Forever." From seeing these two Disney Princesses together in the same scene and film,the aforementioned theory that some fans have developed is that Rapunzel is a cousin of Anna and Elsa,and that their mothers are sisters.Therefore,this means that Rapunzel and Eugene must exist in the same universe as Elsa and Anna. But like I sinabi before,I don’t agree with or believe this theory.Why? For sone reason,these characters actually do not exist in the same time period.According to Nathan Greno and Byron Howard,the directors of Tangled,the sinabi film is set during the 1780s.On the other hand,Frozen is set during the 1840s,which is a fact confirmed in the book "The Art of Frozen".
For another reason,this is not the first film in which Disney has shown characters from other Disney works.On many occasions,they have recycled animation from past films into others,including with character appearances.For example,Bambi and his mother make a brief appearance in The Rescuers.In fact,animation from Bambi has been reused madami than any other animated film,with Bambi’s mother making cameos in The Sword in the Stone,The Jungle Book,and Beauty and the Beast.The king and Grand Duke from Sinderella appear during the chaos of Eric and Vanessa’s would-be wedding in The Little Mermaid.In Aladdin,as Genie looks through the wish recipe book,he comes to a alimasag recipe and gets pinched sa pamamagitan ng Sebastian.And in Hercules,the lion skin of Scar from The Lion King is briefly worn sa pamamagitan ng the pamagat character,then Phil uses it to clean his face.
My pangkalahatang point in naming these examples is that I don’t believe the theory within nagyelo because Disney has put many of these Easter eggs and references in their films as surprises and joke purposes that are meant to be just for fun.They are not meant to be taken seriously or literally in believing that their worlds are canonically connected to one another.In other words,we are not supposed or expected to really believe that all of these people or anthropomorphic mga hayop exist in the same universes and during the same time periods.
I also don’t accept these crossover theories of characters from different stories and films existing in the same universe,especially if the creators or directors don’t make any confirmation of them being true or if they are not outright stated to be the same characters.The other part of it is,just because we see all of these characters,based on their similarities to the real characters in how they look and what they do,in these pelikula doesn’t mean that we should believe it is actually them.Like just because we see Hercules feature lion skin that looks just like that of Scar doesn’t mean that it is the exact same character,particularly since Scar died from being mauled,then was presumably consumed sa pamamagitan ng fire,in his film.
So the same concept applies to the cameos of Rapunzel and Eugene.Just because the two people we see in nagyelo look like them, it doesn’t mean that it IS actually them and that they exist at the same time as Elsa and Anna.
Now I do think it’s an interesting theory,but for all reasons stated above,I don’t agree with it.
As always,Smell ya' later!
For another reason,this is not the first film in which Disney has shown characters from other Disney works.On many occasions,they have recycled animation from past films into others,including with character appearances.For example,Bambi and his mother make a brief appearance in The Rescuers.In fact,animation from Bambi has been reused madami than any other animated film,with Bambi’s mother making cameos in The Sword in the Stone,The Jungle Book,and Beauty and the Beast.The king and Grand Duke from Sinderella appear during the chaos of Eric and Vanessa’s would-be wedding in The Little Mermaid.In Aladdin,as Genie looks through the wish recipe book,he comes to a alimasag recipe and gets pinched sa pamamagitan ng Sebastian.And in Hercules,the lion skin of Scar from The Lion King is briefly worn sa pamamagitan ng the pamagat character,then Phil uses it to clean his face.
My pangkalahatang point in naming these examples is that I don’t believe the theory within nagyelo because Disney has put many of these Easter eggs and references in their films as surprises and joke purposes that are meant to be just for fun.They are not meant to be taken seriously or literally in believing that their worlds are canonically connected to one another.In other words,we are not supposed or expected to really believe that all of these people or anthropomorphic mga hayop exist in the same universes and during the same time periods.
I also don’t accept these crossover theories of characters from different stories and films existing in the same universe,especially if the creators or directors don’t make any confirmation of them being true or if they are not outright stated to be the same characters.The other part of it is,just because we see all of these characters,based on their similarities to the real characters in how they look and what they do,in these pelikula doesn’t mean that we should believe it is actually them.Like just because we see Hercules feature lion skin that looks just like that of Scar doesn’t mean that it is the exact same character,particularly since Scar died from being mauled,then was presumably consumed sa pamamagitan ng fire,in his film.
So the same concept applies to the cameos of Rapunzel and Eugene.Just because the two people we see in nagyelo look like them, it doesn’t mean that it IS actually them and that they exist at the same time as Elsa and Anna.
Now I do think it’s an interesting theory,but for all reasons stated above,I don’t agree with it.
As always,Smell ya' later!
uy everybody! Happy DMLK day! I'll celebrate sa pamamagitan ng some mixed people...
Lottie and Tia!
I like that even in their racist times Tiana and Lottie were mga kaibigan all the way... I'm sure in events before the movie, Charlotte's light skinned mga kaibigan judged her because she was mga kaibigan with Tia and Tia's darker dark skinned mga kaibigan didn't trust Lottie... I found this relationship sweet... she even risked a life-long dream for Tia. Can this friendship get anymore sweeter???
:') They've been mga kaibigan since they were 5 or 7... unlike Pocahontas and her BFF... we don't know a lot about them... she seemed like a character after those sailors... but Lottie and Tia have that kind of friendship. The highlight is their times. Talk about racist! So yeah that's it!
This Friendship is perfect for today!
[I] I'll do it but for you Tia, no marriage included![I]
Lottie and Tia!
I like that even in their racist times Tiana and Lottie were mga kaibigan all the way... I'm sure in events before the movie, Charlotte's light skinned mga kaibigan judged her because she was mga kaibigan with Tia and Tia's darker dark skinned mga kaibigan didn't trust Lottie... I found this relationship sweet... she even risked a life-long dream for Tia. Can this friendship get anymore sweeter???
:') They've been mga kaibigan since they were 5 or 7... unlike Pocahontas and her BFF... we don't know a lot about them... she seemed like a character after those sailors... but Lottie and Tia have that kind of friendship. The highlight is their times. Talk about racist! So yeah that's it!
This Friendship is perfect for today!
[I] I'll do it but for you Tia, no marriage included![I]
Well, Om Nelle may not be a Disney princess, but Mulan isn't actually a princess either. Her heroism made Mulan a princess, even though she had nothing to do with the royal family. Om Nelle does a lot of heroics. Just like a Mulan. Moreover, it even has a crown. A tiara with a cute blue stone. But there are a few problems. For example, this crown is actually a belt. Also, even if this was a real crown, Om Nelle has nothing to do with royalty. Om Nelle is a creature, so not a human. That's okay because Nala in The Lion King is also an animal but is considered a Disney Princess. Now the only problem is, Disney didn't create Om Nelle. So she may be a princess in her own right, but never a Disney princess. She would still make a great disney princess out of her.
She's gentle, kind, and clumsy and is bravo enough to stand up to Clayton even when he has a gun -BB2010
I pag-ibig how awkward yet interesting she is; I admire her bravery and empathy, and I like how she has a talent for drawing and curiosity for the jungle life. I pag-ibig her relationship with Tarzan, one of my paborito Disney couples; her disensyo is really pretty as well -WhiteLagoon13
Everything! She is smart, she is dedicated to her work, but I also pag-ibig that her "damsel" moments are the result of her being in an unfamiliar situation, and that she learns to adjust to her new environment sa pamamagitan ng the end of the movie. -Swanpride
I pag-ibig how awkward yet interesting she is; I admire her bravery and empathy, and I like how she has a talent for drawing and curiosity for the jungle life. I pag-ibig her relationship with Tarzan, one of my paborito Disney couples; her disensyo is really pretty as well -WhiteLagoon13
Everything! She is smart, she is dedicated to her work, but I also pag-ibig that her "damsel" moments are the result of her being in an unfamiliar situation, and that she learns to adjust to her new environment sa pamamagitan ng the end of the movie. -Swanpride