Spike Club
sumali
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
I've recently been looking on walang tiyak na layunin websites for artikulo about BTVS, just to read other people's opinions. I've found out it just isn't a great thing for me to do, as I find myself so worked up sa pamamagitan ng people dissing Spike's character, stressing him as the major element in the downfall of BTVS.

[url=http://dir.salon.com/ent/feature/2003/05/13/spike_buffy/]

This website, for example, claims that Spike is a "too-cool thug in a leather jacket" who "has diverted a good ipakita from its original mission: To celebrate the uncool outcasts of the world."

[url=http://io9.com/5299054/its-buffys-fault-that-vampires-are-weak-now]

This website, too, fired my anger and disgust. It claims similar opinions, including, "you can chart the rise of Spike as an allegedly "lovable" character as the downfall of BTVS." Downfall my ass. Spike was such a major character in BTVS and crucial to its success in many ways, and this has been proven in the kamakailan SFX magazine's listahan of vampires, on which Spike came in as #1. Everyone loved Spike, and I personally thought his plot lines were edge-of-your-seat stuff. Particularly in season 6 (which happens to be my favourite season) we saw an edgier, darker side to the ipakita and a lot of that was contributed sa pamamagitan ng Spike himself and his platonic relationship with Buffy.

"But when Spike isn't wishing he could start murdering every human in sight again, he's pining after Buffy, following her around and moping like a schoolboy. It's like the darker, less noble — and less interesting — version of Angel's season-one stalkerhood." Quite the contrary, lots of people would agree that Spike's stalkerhood of Buffy was funny, entertaining and sad at the same time, courtesy to James Marsters' and Sarah Michelle Gellar's pagganap ability and chemistry.

While the may-akda of this artikulo raves on about Spike's pitiful wimpishness and moping, Spike is widely known for his flippant and badass attitude. It is only really in Season 7 when he gets "mopey" so to speak, and he has a good reason for doing so. He tried to rape Buffy in season 6, something he found incredibly difficult to deal with. He just couldn't forgive himself. It isn't something you can just jump back from.

I don't think Spike was weak AT ALL. He gave up his life to save the world from the First, he regained his soul sa pamamagitan ng going through incredibly dangerous tests to redeem himself for what he had done to Buffy, and to tuktok it all off he was a funny, witty, badass, memorable character and one of the most loved, prolific and amazing Bampira of all time.
added by fanfly
Source: www.chosentwo.com/buffy/media.php
added by fanfly
Source: www.chosentwo.com/buffy/media.php
added by Angie22
added by Angie22
added by Angie22
Ok, here I go. First, I wanna apologize for my English, because it's quite bad (I'm Russian).

I was really impressed (in a bad way) sa pamamagitan ng the comments most of Spike haters make all over the internet. All of those comments seem to be very alike: "Spike was bad, while Angel was good". I could never understand this statement. Let's see:

We have two soulless vampires. Angelus and Spike. They both where bad. Yes. Bampira are bad. Sorry, Stephenie Mayer. But even soulless Spike had madami humanity than soulless Angel: when Angelus became a vampire, he killed all his family, while Spike tried to save his...
continue reading...
added by karlyluvsam
Source: minsc72@tumblr
added by karlyluvsam
Source: theblutomato@tumblr
added by charmeddexter
added by karlyluvsam
Source: picknic ... cafe press
added by em_em
added by em_em
added by JesseIsLoveMD
Source: civilizedjames
added by MissParanoia
added by karma93
added by em_em
added by amazondebs
Source: 20th century soro
added by karlyluvsam
Source: spawn-from-the-hellmouth@tumblr
added by Johnny1982