Oh, fallacies!
So.. as stupid as this may sound, I've never really known about fallacies. That is, until this year, when we learned about them. To tell you the truth, I felt pretty stupid after that English lesson.. not because I had never known about fallacies, but because I realized that I used them in A LOT of arguments. O.o
So I guess I just wanna listahan a couple of popular ones, and define them for any of you who also don't really know about fallacies, and just talk a bit about them and how I've used them before.
1. ad hominem
This is when the arguer attacks the person instead of the argument they're making.
Well well well well. I'm not sure if I do this often, because I can't bring myself to remember a time I criticized a person instead of their argument, but then again, I could have been doing it subconsciously. Here is an example of a person using the ad hominem fallacy:
Person 1: Aso are better than cats.
Person 2: No, Pusa are better!
Person 1: Aso are better because they are madami trusting and loving than cats.
Person 2: Pusa are loving creatures too.
Person 1: I didn't say Pusa weren't loving, but Aso are madami loving than them.
Person 2: You're such an idiot! Any smart person knows that Pusa are better!
See? If you were the segundo person in this argument, you probably even wouldn't realize that you were using a fallacy. Why? Because it's just a reflex you have when you're in an argument, and you're frustrated. It might be because you don't have any evidence or facts to support your side of the argument left, or maybe you're in the heat of the argument and you say that out of passion. Who knows… the point is it's stupid. It might not sound stupid then, but if you review the argument later on, you realize how stupid it was. What's even worse is that the person you're arguing with will probably notice that you're attacking them instead of their argument, and that doesn't give off a good impression. -.-
***
2. ad ignorantiam
When you state that a specific belief is true because we don't know that it's not true.
Haha! Sorry, it's just that I use this one….. A LOT. I'm Christian, and so I'm always ready to defend the existence of God, but I've never realized how often my arguments use this fallacy. Here's an example:
Atheist: God doesn't exist.
Me: Yes, He does.
Atheist: How do you know that?
Me: Because you don't know for sure that He doesn't. There isn't any real evidence.
O.O
I do this in almost any argument about religion, and I'm sure you do too in any kind of argument really. It's hard not to… I mean, it seems like the PERFECT response, when in fact, it isn't. I guess it's an easy-way-out, when you don't have any evidence to back yourself up. Heh. Quite sad really, so be careful about this one! It's hard to not use it at times..
***
3. Argument from authority
When you state that something is true because an individual of high authority or power says so.
"You must pag-ibig others because God sinabi so." This is probably my state of mind at all times, but in this case, it isn't a bad thing because I'm not arguing with anyone, and when was loving someone a bad thing?! An example of this fallacy would be:
Person 1: Aliens exist.
Person 2: How do you know?
Person 1: Well, there have been UFO sightings sa pamamagitan ng airline pilots, so that's proof that they exist.
Person 2: Can you trust these airline pilots?
Person 1: Of course! They are trained observers, they're reliable, and don't panic in emergencies. They are completely trustworthy.
I'm not sure how many of you use this fallacy in your arguments, but it's understandable because it seems like common sense to trust any professional. The only thing you need to know is that highly educated people can sometimes be wrong~ we are human after all.
***
4. Post Hoc or Doubtful Cause
Because one event follows another, the first event must be the cause for the second.
I'm pretty sure that people do this a lot, because it seems logical, and sometimes it could be the case. However, there are other factors that can cause a situation, besides the prior event. Here is an example of this fallacy:
I didn't do my Math homework, and I failed the susunod Math test we had. My Math teacher failed me because I didn't do his/her work.
..or another example I like:
Since Obama has come into office; unemployment has increased. Obama's policies have caused madami people to be unemployed.
As you can see, it's pretty straightforward. This fallacy is very much about assumptions, so you can pretty much say that whenever you make an assumption, you might be using this fallacy! Be cautious assumptive arguments.
***
5. False Analogy
Assuming a similarity between two things, people, or situations when in fact the two things being compared are not similar in any fashion.
I do this a lot, especially when I'm arguing with my brother. I guess it's because I'm trying to think of a comparison, and go with the first thing that comes to mind, which often ends up being a useless comparison. Here is an example of a false analogy:
This maliit na bola ng karne pasta tastes like heaven!
A simple harmless face…. laced with a false analogy. A maliit na bola ng karne pasta has a physical existence, whereas heaven is spiritual. Therefore, you cannot compare the two, because they are completely different from each other. On the other hand, you won't be taken to jail if you do, because you're merely hyperbole to express and emphasize how you feel about the pasta. The only time you shouldn't use a hyperbole is if you're trying to make a serious argument… you don't want to exaggerate then, but be clear and concise.
***
6. Non sequitur
When you make an argument in which the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Sounds kinda like the post hoc right? Well, it's similar in some ways, but the difference is that the post hoc is due to a lack of a casual connect, but the non sequitur fallacy is due to a lack of a logical connection. Non sequiturs are jumps in logic, that really make no sense. Here is an example, I had to take it from this site: <link> because I actually had trouble thinking of my own:
There is a God; the Bible says God created the Earth about 6000 years ago. Therefore, the world is only about 6000 years old.
I'm not sure if I even need to say much about this, because it's pretty straightforward. I can't say that I use this fallacy a lot, but you can think of times when you might have. :P
***
7. Slippery Slope
Stating that an event will result from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question.
This is one of my favorites, because I use it a lot, and I'm sure other people do too. :D Don't like.. there is one point in your life when you've done this. Probably for emphasis or something, because this fallacy seems like the kind you purposely use, not accidentally. Eh, any-who… Here's an example:
We have to stop global warming, otherwise in a couple of years, we'll all be dead!
…another famous one:
You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they'll walk over you.
Slippery slopes usually jump a couple of steps, so instead of going from Point A to Point B, you end up going from Point A to Point E. So, even though global warming is ruining our planet, and will cause HUGE issues in the future, if you state your argument like I did above, it sounds quite ridiculous. Even the segundo example may be true, but you can't state that giving even one person a break will cause everyone to walk over you. I think all the fallacies I've mentioned have one moral: Think before you speak. Lol.. otherwise, you end up sounding quite stupid, for lack of a better word.
***
8. Straw Man
When you misinterpret or set up a fake/weaker example of someone's argument, and then disagree with the fake argument.
I do this a lot, except I don't even know when I do. Whenever I argue about the existence of God, I usually do this because it's just easier than trying to argue with the real argument, lol. I don't do it on purpose though, but I'm pretty sure that all them Atheists I argue with think I am.. ^.^ Here is an example:
Boy: Dad, can we get a dog?
Father: No son.
Boy: But why?
Father: Because a dog is a lot of work, and we don't have the time and patience to take care of one.
Boy: A dog would be great protection! You want to leave our house unprotected!
Seems kind of silly when you read it, but you probably do that everyday if your life. Face it, you do. Whether on purpose or not, you do because that's just the way it is. Great debaters always make sure to argue with the other person's argument, and not with a straw man. I am not a great debater, so I always make that mistake. It's actually REALLY hard.. you have no idea. It's like a subconscious thing. :P Argh, stupid straw man.
***
9. Begging the tanong or Circular Reasoning
Making an argument in which each stage of the argument uses the nakaraan stage as justification.
Basically, going around in circles. I do this a lot as well, because like most of these fallacies, it just makes things easier! It also makes a lot of sense while typing the argument, but when someone points it out and you re-read what you wrote…. yeah, it looks pretty dumb. Here is an example:
Believer: God does exist.
Non-believer: How do you know?
Believer: Because the Bible says so.
Non-believer: How do you know the Bible is saying the truth?
Believer: Because it was written sa pamamagitan ng God.
I actually googled this example, and the first time I read it, I didn't see the fallacy. It seemed like a perfectly normal and valid argument to me! Hahaha! I really need to reevaluate myself. Anyway, after the 3rd read, I got it and I had to matunog na halik myself on the forehead, because I probably use circular reasoning a lot. :P I'm sure you do as well… let's face it. It's just one of those things that's segundo nature…. or maybe that's just me.
***
10. Appeal to Popular Opinion
When you claim that an idea or belief is true because it's what most people believe.
Another common one, that EVERYONE uses. Don't lie to yourself, you do it all the time. When you decide to buy the new iPhone or new music album sa pamamagitan ng Rihanna, you're using this fallacy; the only reason you're buying those items is because EVERYONE says they're great. Here is an example of this fallacy:
Me: I have to go see the Avengers!
Wendy: Why?
Me: Because it's a great movie!
Wendy: How do you know? You haven't even watched it..
Me: Because everyone says it's great!
Just a side note: the Avengers actually is a pretty epic movie, so you should watch it. Anyway, this fallacy is very very popular, because it's usually how we make decisions in life.. lol. However, if you're an independent, strong individual, then perhaps you don't succumb to using this fallacy. O.o
So.. as stupid as this may sound, I've never really known about fallacies. That is, until this year, when we learned about them. To tell you the truth, I felt pretty stupid after that English lesson.. not because I had never known about fallacies, but because I realized that I used them in A LOT of arguments. O.o
So I guess I just wanna listahan a couple of popular ones, and define them for any of you who also don't really know about fallacies, and just talk a bit about them and how I've used them before.
1. ad hominem
This is when the arguer attacks the person instead of the argument they're making.
Well well well well. I'm not sure if I do this often, because I can't bring myself to remember a time I criticized a person instead of their argument, but then again, I could have been doing it subconsciously. Here is an example of a person using the ad hominem fallacy:
Person 1: Aso are better than cats.
Person 2: No, Pusa are better!
Person 1: Aso are better because they are madami trusting and loving than cats.
Person 2: Pusa are loving creatures too.
Person 1: I didn't say Pusa weren't loving, but Aso are madami loving than them.
Person 2: You're such an idiot! Any smart person knows that Pusa are better!
See? If you were the segundo person in this argument, you probably even wouldn't realize that you were using a fallacy. Why? Because it's just a reflex you have when you're in an argument, and you're frustrated. It might be because you don't have any evidence or facts to support your side of the argument left, or maybe you're in the heat of the argument and you say that out of passion. Who knows… the point is it's stupid. It might not sound stupid then, but if you review the argument later on, you realize how stupid it was. What's even worse is that the person you're arguing with will probably notice that you're attacking them instead of their argument, and that doesn't give off a good impression. -.-
***
2. ad ignorantiam
When you state that a specific belief is true because we don't know that it's not true.
Haha! Sorry, it's just that I use this one….. A LOT. I'm Christian, and so I'm always ready to defend the existence of God, but I've never realized how often my arguments use this fallacy. Here's an example:
Atheist: God doesn't exist.
Me: Yes, He does.
Atheist: How do you know that?
Me: Because you don't know for sure that He doesn't. There isn't any real evidence.
O.O
I do this in almost any argument about religion, and I'm sure you do too in any kind of argument really. It's hard not to… I mean, it seems like the PERFECT response, when in fact, it isn't. I guess it's an easy-way-out, when you don't have any evidence to back yourself up. Heh. Quite sad really, so be careful about this one! It's hard to not use it at times..
***
3. Argument from authority
When you state that something is true because an individual of high authority or power says so.
"You must pag-ibig others because God sinabi so." This is probably my state of mind at all times, but in this case, it isn't a bad thing because I'm not arguing with anyone, and when was loving someone a bad thing?! An example of this fallacy would be:
Person 1: Aliens exist.
Person 2: How do you know?
Person 1: Well, there have been UFO sightings sa pamamagitan ng airline pilots, so that's proof that they exist.
Person 2: Can you trust these airline pilots?
Person 1: Of course! They are trained observers, they're reliable, and don't panic in emergencies. They are completely trustworthy.
I'm not sure how many of you use this fallacy in your arguments, but it's understandable because it seems like common sense to trust any professional. The only thing you need to know is that highly educated people can sometimes be wrong~ we are human after all.
***
4. Post Hoc or Doubtful Cause
Because one event follows another, the first event must be the cause for the second.
I'm pretty sure that people do this a lot, because it seems logical, and sometimes it could be the case. However, there are other factors that can cause a situation, besides the prior event. Here is an example of this fallacy:
I didn't do my Math homework, and I failed the susunod Math test we had. My Math teacher failed me because I didn't do his/her work.
..or another example I like:
Since Obama has come into office; unemployment has increased. Obama's policies have caused madami people to be unemployed.
As you can see, it's pretty straightforward. This fallacy is very much about assumptions, so you can pretty much say that whenever you make an assumption, you might be using this fallacy! Be cautious assumptive arguments.
***
5. False Analogy
Assuming a similarity between two things, people, or situations when in fact the two things being compared are not similar in any fashion.
I do this a lot, especially when I'm arguing with my brother. I guess it's because I'm trying to think of a comparison, and go with the first thing that comes to mind, which often ends up being a useless comparison. Here is an example of a false analogy:
This maliit na bola ng karne pasta tastes like heaven!
A simple harmless face…. laced with a false analogy. A maliit na bola ng karne pasta has a physical existence, whereas heaven is spiritual. Therefore, you cannot compare the two, because they are completely different from each other. On the other hand, you won't be taken to jail if you do, because you're merely hyperbole to express and emphasize how you feel about the pasta. The only time you shouldn't use a hyperbole is if you're trying to make a serious argument… you don't want to exaggerate then, but be clear and concise.
***
6. Non sequitur
When you make an argument in which the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Sounds kinda like the post hoc right? Well, it's similar in some ways, but the difference is that the post hoc is due to a lack of a casual connect, but the non sequitur fallacy is due to a lack of a logical connection. Non sequiturs are jumps in logic, that really make no sense. Here is an example, I had to take it from this site: <link> because I actually had trouble thinking of my own:
There is a God; the Bible says God created the Earth about 6000 years ago. Therefore, the world is only about 6000 years old.
I'm not sure if I even need to say much about this, because it's pretty straightforward. I can't say that I use this fallacy a lot, but you can think of times when you might have. :P
***
7. Slippery Slope
Stating that an event will result from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question.
This is one of my favorites, because I use it a lot, and I'm sure other people do too. :D Don't like.. there is one point in your life when you've done this. Probably for emphasis or something, because this fallacy seems like the kind you purposely use, not accidentally. Eh, any-who… Here's an example:
We have to stop global warming, otherwise in a couple of years, we'll all be dead!
…another famous one:
You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they'll walk over you.
Slippery slopes usually jump a couple of steps, so instead of going from Point A to Point B, you end up going from Point A to Point E. So, even though global warming is ruining our planet, and will cause HUGE issues in the future, if you state your argument like I did above, it sounds quite ridiculous. Even the segundo example may be true, but you can't state that giving even one person a break will cause everyone to walk over you. I think all the fallacies I've mentioned have one moral: Think before you speak. Lol.. otherwise, you end up sounding quite stupid, for lack of a better word.
***
8. Straw Man
When you misinterpret or set up a fake/weaker example of someone's argument, and then disagree with the fake argument.
I do this a lot, except I don't even know when I do. Whenever I argue about the existence of God, I usually do this because it's just easier than trying to argue with the real argument, lol. I don't do it on purpose though, but I'm pretty sure that all them Atheists I argue with think I am.. ^.^ Here is an example:
Boy: Dad, can we get a dog?
Father: No son.
Boy: But why?
Father: Because a dog is a lot of work, and we don't have the time and patience to take care of one.
Boy: A dog would be great protection! You want to leave our house unprotected!
Seems kind of silly when you read it, but you probably do that everyday if your life. Face it, you do. Whether on purpose or not, you do because that's just the way it is. Great debaters always make sure to argue with the other person's argument, and not with a straw man. I am not a great debater, so I always make that mistake. It's actually REALLY hard.. you have no idea. It's like a subconscious thing. :P Argh, stupid straw man.
***
9. Begging the tanong or Circular Reasoning
Making an argument in which each stage of the argument uses the nakaraan stage as justification.
Basically, going around in circles. I do this a lot as well, because like most of these fallacies, it just makes things easier! It also makes a lot of sense while typing the argument, but when someone points it out and you re-read what you wrote…. yeah, it looks pretty dumb. Here is an example:
Believer: God does exist.
Non-believer: How do you know?
Believer: Because the Bible says so.
Non-believer: How do you know the Bible is saying the truth?
Believer: Because it was written sa pamamagitan ng God.
I actually googled this example, and the first time I read it, I didn't see the fallacy. It seemed like a perfectly normal and valid argument to me! Hahaha! I really need to reevaluate myself. Anyway, after the 3rd read, I got it and I had to matunog na halik myself on the forehead, because I probably use circular reasoning a lot. :P I'm sure you do as well… let's face it. It's just one of those things that's segundo nature…. or maybe that's just me.
***
10. Appeal to Popular Opinion
When you claim that an idea or belief is true because it's what most people believe.
Another common one, that EVERYONE uses. Don't lie to yourself, you do it all the time. When you decide to buy the new iPhone or new music album sa pamamagitan ng Rihanna, you're using this fallacy; the only reason you're buying those items is because EVERYONE says they're great. Here is an example of this fallacy:
Me: I have to go see the Avengers!
Wendy: Why?
Me: Because it's a great movie!
Wendy: How do you know? You haven't even watched it..
Me: Because everyone says it's great!
Just a side note: the Avengers actually is a pretty epic movie, so you should watch it. Anyway, this fallacy is very very popular, because it's usually how we make decisions in life.. lol. However, if you're an independent, strong individual, then perhaps you don't succumb to using this fallacy. O.o
Donald Trump is The Man.
Guyz!!1! Think about this 4 a moment!!!!!!!!1!
Wot if... THaSlimJim never was real??
Wot if he was actually kidnapped sa pamamagitan ng aliens 1282839 years nakaraan and replaced our Prez w/ an alien PRETENDING to be the real SlimJim to fool us????????
Wot if they are just waiting for the araw to take over earth through ThaSlimJim with an army of Slim Jims??/?/?
Wot if ThaSlimJim was behind the whole moon landing???
Wot if we are all figments of imagination created sa pamamagitan ng slim jims????
Wot if the origin of all weebs was bc of ThaSlimJim?????
Wot if... wot if this entire meme is a lie???!!?
WOT IF THIS ENTIRE artikulo IS A LIE!!!1/??
WOT IF-
:v
Wot if... THaSlimJim never was real??
Wot if he was actually kidnapped sa pamamagitan ng aliens 1282839 years nakaraan and replaced our Prez w/ an alien PRETENDING to be the real SlimJim to fool us????????
Wot if they are just waiting for the araw to take over earth through ThaSlimJim with an army of Slim Jims??/?/?
Wot if ThaSlimJim was behind the whole moon landing???
Wot if we are all figments of imagination created sa pamamagitan ng slim jims????
Wot if the origin of all weebs was bc of ThaSlimJim?????
Wot if... wot if this entire meme is a lie???!!?
WOT IF THIS ENTIRE artikulo IS A LIE!!!1/??
WOT IF-
:v
